Campaigns are increasing in the United States and Europe, aiming to hold Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responsible for Israel's aggressive policies, raising questions about the U.S.'s exoneration from its imperial crimes. This campaign, which recently emerged from the American right and has garnered support from some leftists, focuses on accusing Netanyahu of dragging Washington into a war with Iran, in an attempt to alleviate pressure from American and Israeli policies that have exacerbated conditions in the Middle East.
This campaign is based on a distorted historical narrative, portraying Netanyahu as responsible for Israel's alleged deviation from a peace path, while many aggressive policies date back decades. Thomas Friedman, one of the prominent defenders of Israel in the United States, has accused Netanyahu of obstructing Israel's "peaceful" record, with Bernie Sanders joining him in his criticisms.
Details of the Campaign
Policies that are frequently criticized include the expansion of Israeli settlements and repeated assaults on Palestinians, including attacks on civilians. These policies are not new; they are an extension of those followed by previous Israeli governments, starting with Menachem Begin in the 1970s. Begin was also accused of escalating aggression against Lebanon and Palestinians, highlighting the continuity of these policies across different governments.
While Netanyahu is portrayed as a primary cause of the worsening situation, many critics overlook that these policies have existed for decades, and previous governments, including Labor governments, have followed similar policies. These historical facts indicate that Netanyahu is merely a part of a larger political system that reflects Israel's colonial tendencies.
Background & Context
Historically, Israeli aggressive policies began with the establishment of the state in 1948, where ethnic cleansing operations against Palestinians were carried out. David Ben-Gurion, Israel's first Prime Minister, clearly stated the necessity of targeting civilians in military operations. These policies have persisted through successive governments, making it difficult to hold Netanyahu solely responsible for what is happening today.
Furthermore, the current campaign to exonerate the United States from its responsibilities in supporting these policies reflects an attempt to change the historical narrative. Instead of acknowledging the American role in supporting the Israeli occupation, blame is directed at Netanyahu as he represents the "evil" in Israeli politics.
Impact & Consequences
These campaigns contribute to increasing division in the international community regarding the Palestinian issue, as Palestinians are depicted solely as victims of Netanyahu's policies, without acknowledging that these policies are the result of a long-standing colonial system. This narrative undermines efforts to achieve peace, as Israel is viewed as a victim state rather than an occupying power.
Additionally, exonerating the United States from its responsibility in supporting these policies reflects a lack of awareness of the complex history of the conflict in the Middle East. Ignoring the U.S. role in promoting the Israeli occupation makes it difficult to make any progress towards a fair and lasting solution.
Regional Significance
These dynamics directly affect Arab countries, where feelings of frustration and anger towards Western policies are growing. Portraying Netanyahu as the sole responsible party for the crises enhances animosity towards the West and complicates relations between Arab countries and Israel. This narrative may also exacerbate internal conflicts within Arab nations, as the Palestinian issue is used as a tool to bolster national sentiments.
In conclusion, Palestinians and their supporters must confront these narratives that seek to exonerate Israel from its historical crimes. Understanding history correctly is the first step towards achieving justice and peace in the region.