The Secretary-General of the Gulf Cooperation Council, Jassim Al-Budaiwi, stated that the member states will not accept being hostages to Iran's policies, pointing out that Iranian attacks on civil and economic facilities in the region are considered heinous aggressions that violate neighborhood rights and international laws.
In a special interview on the program "The Interview," Al-Budaiwi highlighted the diplomatic efforts made by the member states to inform Iran of their neutral stance regarding the ongoing conflict, affirming that no logistical facilities have been provided to American forces in their war against Tehran.
Details of the Event
The Secretary-General revealed a serious Gulf initiative to find strategic alternatives to the Strait of Hormuz, ensuring that energy flows do not remain hostage to Iran's "disgraceful" policies. He expressed astonishment at the Iranian "treachery," citing the targeting of the Duqm refinery in Oman and facilities in Qatar and Kuwait, reflecting that Iranian promises of rapprochement were merely "words on paper."
Al-Budaiwi also noted that the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the targeting of energy facilities have affected over 20% of global energy supplies, necessitating the adoption of alternative measures and plans to ensure the continuity of oil and gas exports.
Background & Context
Historically, the Strait of Hormuz is one of the most important maritime passages in the world, through which approximately 20% of total global oil supplies pass. The region has witnessed increasing tensions in recent years due to aggressive Iranian policies, prompting Gulf countries to seek alternatives to secure energy supplies.
These statements come at a time when fears are rising regarding escalating tensions in the region, as the Gulf Cooperation Council seeks to enhance its security and stability through collective defense cooperation.
Impact & Consequences
The Gulf Cooperation Council anticipates that these policies will strengthen its position against Iranian threats, as the member states possess substantial reserves and sovereign funds that enable them to absorb economic shocks resulting from any potential escalation.
Al-Budaiwi also made a comparison between the developmental model of the Gulf and Iranian models, illustrating that the national output of three small Gulf countries (Qatar, Kuwait, and Bahrain) is equivalent to the national output of Iran, reflecting the developmental gap between the two sides.
Regional Significance
These statements serve as a call for regional countries to unify their efforts in facing common challenges, as Gulf security is considered an indivisible whole. The coordination among Gulf Cooperation Council states reflects the importance of unified military leadership as a lifeline to confront any future threats.
In conclusion, Al-Budaiwi affirmed that diplomatic dialogue remains an open option, but is contingent upon the existence of a "wise" Iranian regime that believes in common interests, reflecting a desire to achieve stability in the region.