U.S. President Donald Trump's remarks about initiating talks with Iran to end the war have raised fears in Israel regarding the achievement of its objectives, particularly concerning Iran's nuclear and missile programs.
In an article for the newspaper Israel Hayom, Israeli writer Dani Zaken pointed out that there is concern within Israeli circles about the possibility that Washington might begin negotiations with Tehran without informing Tel Aviv, which could lead to an end to the conflict without achieving Israeli goals. Zaken explained that any talks between the United States and Iran could end either with Iran's surrender or with a deal that ensures a smooth American exit from the war.
Details of the Event
On Monday, Trump spoke about talks with Tehran, indicating that the war with Iran is nearing its end. He also announced a postponement of military strikes he had threatened against Iran's electricity sector, suggesting that there is a diplomatic move that requires the involved parties to give it a chance to succeed.
Despite ongoing mutual attacks, the coming hours will reveal whether the talks are serious and whether Trump has indeed agreed to a ceasefire. In the same context, Zaken mentioned that Iran had attempted to communicate with the United States since the end of the war, but Washington had refused on the grounds that Iran was not ready to commit to American conditions, which seems to have changed now.
Context and Background
Tehran has set fundamental conditions for de-escalation, while Washington continues to refuse to respond to demands related to compensation and recognition of "aggression." A senior Iranian official revealed to Al Jazeera the behind-the-scenes of the ongoing indirect communications with the United States, confirming that messages are exchanged between Tehran and Washington through Egypt and Turkey, as part of a goodwill effort to reduce tensions.
Regarding Trump's statements about negotiation deadlines, the Iranian official emphasized that the U.S. president does not have the authority to set conditions or deadlines for negotiations, reflecting the complexity of the political situation in the region.
Impact and Consequences
According to Zaken, discussing the removal of the Iranian threat to Israel and the entire region through negotiations is exaggerated, as hostile operations will not cease as long as radical Islam exists. However, continuing negotiations may mean meeting American and Israeli demands, which include ending the Iranian nuclear program, the missile program, halting support for "terrorist organizations," and canceling the policy of exporting the revolution.
If those demands are met, the war could end with an American and Israeli victory, although the Iranian regime will remain and will try to revert to its "old ways." In this context, Newsweek magazine identified five potential scenarios for the end of the Iranian war, with the most likely scenario being a gradual reduction of military operations without a formal agreement.
Impact on the Arab Region
Concerns are growing in the Arab region about the repercussions of any potential agreement between the United States and Iran, as this could affect regional balances and enhance Tehran's influence in the area. Additionally, ongoing tensions could lead to a new escalation in existing conflicts, threatening the stability of countries in the region.
In conclusion, the situation in the region remains open to all possibilities, requiring careful monitoring by all involved parties, with the necessity of recognizing that any agreement could change the dynamics of the conflict in the Middle East.